|
|
Post by ethanm1834 on Jan 9, 2014 11:56:10 GMT -5
I've thought this over and I think I'll get this as well. The more I think about it, the more I want to know what is in their on Demand service.
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeywool on Jan 9, 2014 12:31:06 GMT -5
You know, I just thought about this... I don't like this because; no DVR. I want to watch RAW, SD, and NXT when I want to watch them Everything is going on VOD bud. So for $9.99 you not only get live stuff and all the ppvs at a significantly cheaper price but you also have on demand access to everything that gets aired either on the network or on tv. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jan 9, 2014 12:42:30 GMT -5
You know, I just thought about this... I don't like this because; no DVR. I want to watch RAW, SD, and NXT when I want to watch them Everything is going on VOD bud. So for $9.99 you not only get live stuff and all the ppvs at a significantly cheaper price but you also have on demand access to everything that gets aired either on the network or on tv. So your British compatriot told me. As I said... I'm now dropping hints to the wife about a great birthday present idea 8) |
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Jan 9, 2014 13:13:49 GMT -5
Some of you may have seen this video of Michael Bay choking on stage at Samsungs curved TV Press interview
Well WWE & DX mocked Bay at last nights Network announcement
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeywool on Jan 9, 2014 13:44:03 GMT -5
Everything is going on VOD bud. So for $9.99 you not only get live stuff and all the ppvs at a significantly cheaper price but you also have on demand access to everything that gets aired either on the network or on tv. So your British compatriot told me. As I said... I'm now dropping hints to the wife about a great birthday present idea 8) Already told the missus when it is out here we're getting it. Far cheaper than £15 a month just for the PPVs and much better value. |
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Jan 9, 2014 14:10:53 GMT -5
I'm wondering about something...
You guys said that they will include every PPV and such...
So now I must ask about that one subject I doubt WWE answered. Will we see Chris Benoit and will they keep those parts unedited?
|
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jan 9, 2014 14:13:11 GMT -5
I'm wondering about something... You guys said that they will include every PPV and such... So now I must ask about that one subject I doubt WWE answered. Will we see Chris Benoit and will they keep those parts unedited? They showed Benoit in the WCW DVDs, they simply cut out all audio that referenced his name. It sucked, but it was better than nothing. I imagine we'll get something similar. I don't think WWE is ready to acknowledge just how stupid their "Benoit ban" is just yet. |
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Jan 9, 2014 14:13:46 GMT -5
I may buy in a few months out of the year. Especially in March/April for WrestleMania and in January for the Royal Rumble.
|
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Jan 9, 2014 14:14:57 GMT -5
I'm wondering about something... You guys said that they will include every PPV and such... So now I must ask about that one subject I doubt WWE answered. Will we see Chris Benoit and will they keep those parts unedited? I read on ewrestling that they will show Benoit matches but will have a warning before them.
"Warning, this match contains Chris Benoit; viewer discretion is advised." 
|
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jan 9, 2014 14:31:00 GMT -5
It really is time for the WWE to take the stick out of it's ass when it comes to Benoit, but that's not going to happen, so there's no reason to dwell on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Jan 9, 2014 14:39:55 GMT -5
I'm wondering about something... You guys said that they will include every PPV and such... So now I must ask about that one subject I doubt WWE answered. Will we see Chris Benoit and will they keep those parts unedited? I answered this already... They are showing an advisory message before any & all shows he is featured in. The message is along the lines of "All characters portrayed in the following are purely fictional" |
|
|
|
Post by monkeywool on Jan 9, 2014 14:43:30 GMT -5
I prefer "warning, this program may contain strong language, strobe lighting effects and Chris Benoit, viewer discretion is advised."
|
|
|
|
Post by miketheratguy on Jan 9, 2014 14:53:03 GMT -5
I hope they add stuff like the roundtable discussions they have On Demand right now to the WWE network's "on demand" service. I personally think this is pretty cool. A bit pricey, maybe, but still pretty cool. I agree. Assuming that the network will offer more than just contemporary PPVs (roundtables, documentaries, bios, classic WWE programming) I'd strongly consider subscribing. |
|
|
|
Post by monkeywool on Jan 9, 2014 14:55:13 GMT -5
I hope they add stuff like the roundtable discussions they have On Demand right now to the WWE network's "on demand" service. I personally think this is pretty cool. A bit pricey, maybe, but still pretty cool. I agree. Assuming that the network will offer more than just contemporary PPVs (roundtables, documentaries, bios, classic WWE programming) I'd strongly consider subscribing. It has definitely got a couple of studio discussion shows. As well as the pre and post show they do for PPVs on Raw and Smackdown. Also Legends house, which sounds utterly stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Jan 9, 2014 14:56:52 GMT -5
I agree. Assuming that the network will offer more than just contemporary PPVs (roundtables, documentaries, bios, classic WWE programming) I'd strongly consider subscribing. It has definitely got a couple of studio discussion shows. As well as the pre and post show they do for PPVs on Raw and Smackdown. Also Legends house, which sounds utterly stupid. But... Jimmy Hart |
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Jan 9, 2014 14:57:34 GMT -5
I agree. Assuming that the network will offer more than just contemporary PPVs (roundtables, documentaries, bios, classic WWE programming) I'd strongly consider subscribing. It has definitely got a couple of studio discussion shows. As well as the pre and post show they do for PPVs on Raw and Smackdown. Also Legends house, which sounds utterly stupid. Who doesn't want to watch a bunch of old WWE legends living together under one roof? Just think of what will happen when Sgt Slaughter finds out that Rikishi ate his breakfast. COBRA CLUTCH! |
|
|
|
Post by monkeywool on Jan 9, 2014 15:01:33 GMT -5
Yeah, no.
It'll be crap on a stick.
|
|
|
|
Post by miketheratguy on Jan 9, 2014 15:06:19 GMT -5
"Legends House"? I smell Piper, Duggan, Snuka, Slaughter and Rhodes (aka the default geezers the company always runs to whenever they want a "Legends" rub. I'm guessing that at least one of those guys was on Raw last week?) sitting around telling the same stories that they always tell. Also, Mick Foley pleasures himself to the image of Jimmy Snuka jumping off the cage.
|
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Jan 9, 2014 15:07:36 GMT -5
"Legends House"? I smell Piper, Duggan, Snuka, Slaughter and Rhodes (aka the default geezers the company always runs to whenever they want a "Legends" rub. I'm guessing that at least one of those guys was on Raw last week?) sitting around telling the same stories that they always tell. Also, Mick Foley pleasures himself to the image of Jimmy Snuka jumping off the cage. And Ric Flair gets drunk and we see epic shenanigans of him going around putting whoopie cushions on chairs and giggling like a little girl when George Steele sits down. |
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Jan 9, 2014 15:11:33 GMT -5
Legends House is old. It was planned when the WWE Network was first announced 3 years ago & Recorded in early 2012....
They wanted it to air on their network when it came to TV, then the TV Network fell through and then they tried to sell it to E! along with Total Divas and they rejected it.
Gene Okerlund, Hacksaw Jim Duggan, Hillbilly Jim, Howard Finkel, Jimmy Hart, Roddy Piper, Pat Patterson and Tony Atlas are the Legends that appeared.
|
|
