|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Feb 3, 2014 8:40:14 GMT -5
Maybe it will be hydra. I know hydra is gonna be avengers 2 . They cast baron Von strucker. Who would you like to see get added to the MCU/avengers roster? Hank Pym! No, wait, they already raped him for a $#@!ing comedy movie. Because, $#@! the fact that he's an original Avenger and all that. 8) I'm mostly a fan of the classic Avengers lineups, so there aren't a lot of people I would want added (plus it just gets too busy with too many characters). It'll be interesting to see what they do about RDJ leaving, if they replace him with another actor or just replace Iron Man with another character altogether. I can see them replacing Iron Man with Wolverine because, HEY, Wolverine has to be in everything (He's my favorite by far, but I dislike how he has his own origins story, his own movie, and the x-men movies, let's not forget he had a cameo in a movie he had no real part of).
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 8:40:17 GMT -5
I just want a nova movie but it looks like james gunn raped any notion of nova getting a movie plus I don't think Disney would get behind a guy named richard rider. That name is to open for scrutiny Well for one thing, Ryder is dead and long since replaced with Sam Alexander...
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Feb 3, 2014 8:43:04 GMT -5
I just want a nova movie but it looks like james gunn raped any notion of nova getting a movie plus I don't think Disney would get behind a guy named richard rider. That name is to open for scrutiny Well for one thing, Ryder is dead and long since replaced with Sam Alexander... I just like rider a lot. Plus how's relationships with Peter quill and gamora I think it could fit in awesome with the cosmic MCU
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 8:43:34 GMT -5
I can see them replacing Iron Man with Wolverine because, HEY, Wolverine has to be in everything (He's my favorite by far, but I dislike how he has his own origins story, his own movie, and the x-men movies, let's not forget he had a cameo in a movie he had no real part of). They can't. They're not allowed to use any of the major X-Men characters until they get the license back from FOX. Same reason we won't see Spider-Man or The Thing (all of whom have been Avengers) in the movies. It's a real shame that Marvel was so short-sighted.
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 8:44:10 GMT -5
Well for one thing, Ryder is dead and long since replaced with Sam Alexander... I just like rider a lot. Plus how's relationships with Peter quill and gamora I think it could fit in awesome with the cosmic MCU I only ever cared about Nova as a member of the original New Warriors
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Feb 3, 2014 8:44:35 GMT -5
I don't get why they sold all of their main characters (not all, but you get what I mean) movie wise. Though it may be more than just for movies, I'm not sure, lol.
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 8:48:27 GMT -5
I don't get why they sold all of their main characters (not all, but you get what I mean) movie wise. Though it may be more than just for movies, I'm not sure, lol. Nope, it's just for movies and live-action TV. They retain the rights for animated shows, etc. They sold them because they were desperate to expand the number of media outlets available to them, and they didn't have the resources to make movies on their own at that time. They attached one of their "insiders" (Avi Arad, and his son) to those contracts to protect their properties, and hoped for the best. It actually succeeded more than they could have hoped, but they never expected those companies to hold on to the licenses like they have. I'm fairly certain that Disney's lawyers are trying to figure out a way to bring Spider-Man and X-Men back "in house" as it were. Probably less diligently with Fantastic Four though 8)
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Feb 3, 2014 8:52:43 GMT -5
I would love spidey and f4 license to be included in MCU. I feel the x men should be kept separate. That's one thing I never understood and hopefully you can clear it for me is why are mutants so looked down upon but other heroes in MU are looked as here's for the people know they could be mutants themselves.
F4 are technically mutants themselves not born with the gifts but still gained through a mutation
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Feb 3, 2014 8:54:29 GMT -5
Also Sony and marvel came close to agreement for avengers. A oscorp building was supposes to be used in the avengers but they couldn't make it in time. So I feel like spidey will eventually be a avenger MCU
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 9:30:24 GMT -5
Also Sony and marvel came close to agreement for avengers. A oscorp building was supposes to be used in the avengers but they couldn't make it in time. So I feel like spidey will eventually be a avenger MCU Won't happen. An OsCorp building is cross-promotional marketing and takes nothing away from Sony's Spider-Man franchise. Being able to see Spider-Man in Avengers movies will make a lot of fans not interested in a solo series with a completely different storyline. In Marvel, the term "mutant" is not "anything that is mutated." It's not a scientific term (nor is it in the real world, btw). It's a descriptor. The word "black" doesn't properly describe people of African heritage either, but we all understand it to mean a certain group of people. "Mutants" in Marvel are people who have an additional bit of genetic encoding with which they were born, the so-called "X-Gene" The Fantastic Four are not mutants. They are humans with altered genetics... as are most of Marvel's non-Mutant characters. The distinction is (in my mind at least) pretty clear. Now as to how one gets to the internal logic that the people of the Marvel Earth would be angry about the guy (or gal) who could read their thoughts or set fire to their baby because they were born that way, and not the ones with the same abilities that they'd received by being bitten by radioactive teletubbies... that I don't know. One reason I really liked Civil War was because it actually put emphasis on the fact that people don't trust anything that's different, no matter why it's different. From a basic logical perspective... the humans in Marvel are right to want protection from Mutants. There are least a dozen Mutants out there who, when their powers were first manifesting, accidentally murdered large numbers of people. That's something to be concerned about, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Feb 3, 2014 11:58:15 GMT -5
Looks good.
|
|
|
Post by WSS? on Feb 3, 2014 12:52:02 GMT -5
Looks great. I'm hyped.
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Feb 3, 2014 12:57:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 3, 2014 12:58:43 GMT -5
I don't like that he appears to be back in the old suit from the Cap movie (I preferred the one from Avengers), but Bucky looks great
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Feb 3, 2014 13:35:35 GMT -5
I don't like that he appears to be back in the old suit from the Cap movie (I preferred the one from Avengers), but Bucky looks great Probably trying to refresh buckys memory
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Mar 7, 2014 19:33:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 7, 2014 21:01:49 GMT -5
The fact that Batroc is in this movie bums me out so much.
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Mar 7, 2014 23:27:58 GMT -5
Why? Looks like he is only in it for the first part to show how badass captain america is
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 8, 2014 10:20:21 GMT -5
Why? Looks like he is only in it for the first part to show how badass captain america is Because Batroc the Leaper is a $#@!ing joke villain. Trying to make him a serious bad guy is like trying to make Tony Stark a responsible adult.
|
|
Rush
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE WORST HUMAN BEING ON THE PLANET
Posts: 2,486
|
Post by Rush on Mar 8, 2014 18:19:53 GMT -5
Why? Looks like he is only in it for the first part to show how badass captain america is Because Batroc the Leaper is a $#@!ing joke villain. Trying to make him a serious bad guy is like trying to make Tony Stark a responsible adult. So it would be like trying to make sam worthinton a passable actor? Leaper looks like he is a throw away villian he's just there to show how cool captain is in the beginning
|
|