Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2013 0:46:27 GMT -5
I aint talking about the feud They aren't going to bring the title back. The WWE title will be the the Undisputed title. Well the idea anyway
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 0:47:03 GMT -5
I new belt makes no sense. Do you know how long it took for this new WWE title? They aren't just going to change it after a couple of months. Yeah it doesn't make sense making a new belt and having someone like Rock present it just to drop it in a few months. I know. It's a slap in the face to a guy who you clearly want to use in some way.
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 26, 2013 0:53:24 GMT -5
Yeah it doesn't make sense making a new belt and having someone like Rock present it just to drop it in a few months. I know. It's a slap in the face to a guy who you clearly want to use in some way. And it would have been a waste of money for WWE to make a new title
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 0:53:49 GMT -5
Just saying, there have been many Superstar-Specific Belts that have been discarded within months of usage & although they were Superstar-Specific, they were still considered the WWE Championship. In my opinion, the Spinner WWE Championship was overused & should have been replaced when Cena lost it. We don't need a repeat of that, I don't think we will, but it just makes no sense to me to not have a new belt created, unless the Superstar carries around both titles all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 0:56:09 GMT -5
Just saying, there have been many Superstar-Specific Belts that have been discarded within months of usage & although they were Superstar-Specific, they were still considered the WWE Championship. In my opinion, the Spinner WWE Championship was overused & should have been replaced when Cena lost it. We don't need a repeat of that, I don't think we will, but it just makes no sense to me to not have a new belt created, unless the Superstar carries around both titles all the time. They are side plates. A new belt would cost money. And you are telling all of those people wanting to buy the current WWE title that it is worthless
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 0:56:11 GMT -5
Just saying, there have been many Superstar-Specific Belts that have been discarded within months of usage & although they were Superstar-Specific, they were still considered the WWE Championship. In my opinion, the Spinner WWE Championship was overused & should have been replaced when Cena lost it. We don't need a repeat of that, I don't think we will, but it just makes no sense to me to not have a new belt created, unless the Superstar carries around both titles all the time. They are side plates. A new belt would cost money. And you are telling all of those people wanting to buy the current WWE title that it is worthless
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 0:57:51 GMT -5
I agree with keeping the current WWE Title if the World Heavyweight Title is kept along with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2013 0:58:05 GMT -5
Good point WWE wouldn't pay a lot of money for a title just to get rid of it later in the year
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 26, 2013 0:59:11 GMT -5
Just saying, there have been many Superstar-Specific Belts that have been discarded within months of usage & although they were Superstar-Specific, they were still considered the WWE Championship. In my opinion, the Spinner WWE Championship was overused & should have been replaced when Cena lost it. We don't need a repeat of that, I don't think we will, but it just makes no sense to me to not have a new belt created, unless the Superstar carries around both titles all the time. The thing is the current WWE title doesn't belong to a specific superstar the side belts change with whoever the champion is. I agree the spinner belt was around way too long and should have only been something Cena used when he was champ.
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 1:01:40 GMT -5
I find it entertaining that the Mods dominate the forum rather than the other members
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 1:03:20 GMT -5
I find it entertaining that the Mods dominate the forum rather than the other members Me as well, we need a better record than 18 users on at one time.
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 26, 2013 1:05:10 GMT -5
I find it entertaining that the Mods dominate the forum rather than the other members They know not to fuck with us.
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 1:06:23 GMT -5
I find it entertaining that the Mods dominate the forum rather than the other members They know not to fuck with us.
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 1:07:03 GMT -5
I find it entertaining that the Mods dominate the forum rather than the other members They know not to fuck with us. I guess I'm Roman Reigns..........
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 1:07:51 GMT -5
"Why isn't fuck being censored?" is the question that is supposed to be under the quote.
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 1:08:47 GMT -5
I'll be which ever guy Seto doesn't want to be.
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Nov 26, 2013 1:09:19 GMT -5
Fuck isn't censored? Wow
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 26, 2013 1:10:35 GMT -5
"Why isn't fuck being censored?" is the question that is supposed to be under the quote. I don't know it suppose to have a * where the u is.
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Nov 26, 2013 1:11:17 GMT -5
I t doesn't help that we keep saying it. We should just fucking stop doing this shit. lol.
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 26, 2013 1:14:37 GMT -5
I t doesn't help that we keep saying it. We should just fucking stop doing this shit. lol. Oh for fuck sake watching you're fucking mouth.
|
|