Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2013 1:02:40 GMT -5
And that is Ryback defeating Undertaker streak...
Thoughts? again only rumors.
|
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Nov 20, 2013 1:03:45 GMT -5
My thoughts?
1. It's not going to happen.
2. It's not going to happen because WWE won't allow Undertaker to lose that streak.
3. It's not going to happen because Ryback sucks.
4. It's not going to happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Nov 20, 2013 1:06:37 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2013 1:06:40 GMT -5
Hopefully it stays a rumor and nothing.
I rather see Taker face a heel Sheamus over the likes of RyBack and his botching brother Lesnar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2013 2:33:25 GMT -5
My thoughts? 1. It's not going to happen. 2. It's not going to happen because WWE won't allow Undertaker to lose that streak. 3. It's not going to happen because Ryback sucks. 4. It's not going to happen. Totally agreed |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Nov 20, 2013 6:35:17 GMT -5
My thoughts? 1. It's not going to happen. 2. It's not going to happen because WWE won't allow Undertaker to lose that streak. 3. It's not going to happen because Ryback sucks. 4. It's not going to happen. I'm not sure I agree with #2, but the rest of these are accurate. If WWE lets 'Taker's streak end, it's not going to be to a guy who has twice failed to make anything of massive pushes that had been handed to him. |
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Nov 20, 2013 6:50:38 GMT -5
It's not going to happen. Especially at this point. Ryback has a piss poor attitude backstage and has essentially flopped every time they've tried to push the guy since he became a heel.
|
|
|
|
Post by shiningwizard on Nov 20, 2013 8:25:33 GMT -5
Hopefully it stays a rumor and nothing. I rather see Taker face a heel Sheamus over the likes of RyBack and his botching brother Lesnar. Ryback ain't gonna end the sreak, especially the way he is now SN, i'd rather Sheamus stay face, though i wouldn't have him end the streak |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Nov 20, 2013 8:27:47 GMT -5
If they'd put Sheamus against 'Taker when he was the new hot monster heel, it would have been a good program and Sheamus would have actually been a good choice to end the streak... but those days are long past, and I don't see any point in attempting to paint Sheamus as a logical contender at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Nov 20, 2013 8:30:59 GMT -5
Personally, I don't think they'll ever have him lose the streak. His fan base is too big. I know several people in the past that have said they will stop watching altogether if he loses at WM. I've stopped caring really. I think if anybody was going to end it it should have been Michaels but meh I really don't even care anymore, I just want the guy to retire.
|
|
|
|
Post by shiningwizard on Nov 20, 2013 8:33:43 GMT -5
The only people I thought at the time would break the streak was Orton, Batista and Michaels(2nd time)
|
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Nov 20, 2013 8:35:12 GMT -5
Personally, I don't think they'll ever have him lose the streak. His fan base is too big. I know several people in the past that have said they will stop watching altogether if he loses at WM. I've stopped caring really. I think if anybody was going to end it it should have been Michaels but meh I really don't even care anymore, I just want the guy to retire. I know tons of people that said they'd move to Canada if Bush won re-election. Unfortunately all of them were still here to vote for Obama. WWE isn't going to lose fans because Undertaker's streak ends, and out of respect for the business, he should follow tradition and go out on his back helping a younger talent in creating his own Legend. A lot of the names that get floated make no sense. Why would Cena, already WWE's closest equivalent to Ric Flair, end the streak? He's got nothing to gain. Same with Orton, etc. If the streak is going to end (and it definitely should), it needs to be someone who is already established enough that the distinction won't go to waste, but who has enough years left on his career to build on the Legend. In WWE's current roster, guys who fit that bill are few and far between. |
|
|
|
Post by charliebucketsgranpa on Nov 20, 2013 8:40:14 GMT -5
Personally, I don't think they'll ever have him lose the streak. His fan base is too big. I know several people in the past that have said they will stop watching altogether if he loses at WM. I've stopped caring really. I think if anybody was going to end it it should have been Michaels but meh I really don't even care anymore, I just want the guy to retire. I know tons of people that said they'd move to Canada if Bush won re-election. Unfortunately all of them were still here to vote for Obama. WWE isn't going to lose fans because Undertaker's streak ends, and out of respect for the business, he should follow tradition and go out on his back helping a younger talent in creating his own Legend. A lot of the names that get floated make no sense. Why would Cena, already WWE's closest equivalent to Ric Flair, end the streak? He's got nothing to gain. Same with Orton, etc. If the streak is going to end (and it definitely should), it needs to be someone who is already established enough that the distinction won't go to waste, but who has enough years left on his career to build on the Legend. In WWE's current roster, guys who fit that bill are few and far between. You have a good first point though I have a friend that I'm pretty sure would have a heartattack if Taker lost at WM. Not really, but I don't know, he would do something drastic. Other than that though you're right but I think at least a few would stop, not that a few would really matter that much. I agree completely on your second point. |
|
justinlynch3
Jobber
Is not creative enough for a status.
Posts: 4,124 
|
Post by justinlynch3 on Nov 20, 2013 9:15:10 GMT -5
Well Taker is already supposed to be facing Lesnar the last I heard. And seeing.
A) How broken up Taker is.
B) The reputation Lesnar has for injuring people (He obviously don't go easy on the elders, he's already taker McMahon out last year).
C) Taker and Lesnar actually supposedly has some real life heat between each other.
I'm thinking if this match happens Taker will probably be forcefully retired with the Streak.
You know what.... I think Taker would be safer with Ryback then with Lesnar.
|
|
|
|
Post by shiningwizard on Nov 20, 2013 9:19:17 GMT -5
ryback will probably face either lesnar or goldberg at mania, just my guess
|
|
justinlynch3
Jobber
Is not creative enough for a status.
Posts: 4,124
|
Post by justinlynch3 on Nov 20, 2013 9:36:04 GMT -5
ryback will probably face either lesnar or goldberg at mania, just my guess Hopefully Ryback faces Lesnar. That way Taker can face someone who won't put him in intensive care. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Nov 20, 2013 9:39:14 GMT -5
I could see 'Taker beating Lesnar at WM30, but being "forced to retire" due to injuries. It would cement Lesnar's legacy as "the Beast" and Undertaker's legacy as the toughest man in the history of the business. The match would suck horribly, but any Undertaker match is going to suck at this point.
Of course he would. Ryback isn't a great worker, but he's not particularly dangerous in the ring. Lesnar is a walking disaster.
|
|
|
|
Post by shiningwizard on Nov 20, 2013 10:01:14 GMT -5
i still think wwe would like to go with the sting v taker match, donlt really see it happening
|
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Nov 20, 2013 10:36:27 GMT -5
Sting vs. Taker is a pipe dream. Oddly, it would be the ONLY Undertaker match that I personally could give a crap about.
|
|
|
|
Post by shiningwizard on Nov 20, 2013 13:36:48 GMT -5
i haven't seen tna since bfg, so i could be wrong, but isnt sting still doin the thing with mem, plus i cant see him leaving tna or tna letting him leave, though i would like to see sting sign with wwe, mainly for a wwe game and maybe a dvd
|
|
