|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:14:19 GMT -5
Isn't Gunner that guy that works for TNA? If he does an F5, I can't say I've seen it. Lesnar's is terrible because he just tosses the guy, which is why he's hurt more people with it than he's ever landed safely. LOL Yo, you don't watch TNA? It's not watchable, but I watch it from time to time. I do watch it sometimes, but only with half of my attention at best. I can honestly say I don't think I've ever seen Gunner hit a finisher. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:16:57 GMT -5
Gunners looks more like a traditional vertical STO
|
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606 
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:17:22 GMT -5
Isn't Gunner that guy that works for TNA? If he does an F5, I can't say I've seen it. Lesnar's is terrible because he just tosses the guy, which is why he's hurt more people with it than he's ever landed safely. ummmm...not a fair side by side comparison...kinda fail from the get go.. |
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Feb 5, 2014 14:17:58 GMT -5
ummmm...not a fair side by side comparison...kinda fail from the get go.. I googled "TNA Gunner F5" that was the first video |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:21:19 GMT -5
ummmm...not a fair side by side comparison...kinda fail from the get go.. I googled "TNA Gunner F5" that was the first video the reply wasn't directed at you, it was for the person who made the video...should have made that clear i guess |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:22:44 GMT -5
A lot of people really like Gunner, apparently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Double-H215 on Feb 5, 2014 14:23:39 GMT -5
Isn't Gunner that guy that works for TNA? If he does an F5, I can't say I've seen it. Lesnar's is terrible because he just tosses the guy, which is why he's hurt more people with it than he's ever landed safely. Not riding, but Brock's was better there. |
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Feb 5, 2014 14:23:44 GMT -5
I googled "TNA Gunner F5" that was the first video the reply wasn't directed at you, it was for the person who made the video...should have made that clear i guess My comment was meant to come across as "Im sorry I posted that awful comparison, But it was the first video I found" |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:24:49 GMT -5
A lot of people really like Gunner, apparently. i've heard of him, that was the first time i've seen him do anything in the ring.. |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:27:08 GMT -5
Not riding, but Brock's was better there. i would disagree. gunnar out daniels down like he was putting a baby to bed..daniels is smaller than austin, if that counts as a qualifier? |
|
|
|
Post by Double-H215 on Feb 5, 2014 14:30:48 GMT -5
Not riding, but Brock's was better there. i would disagree. gunnar out daniels down like he was putting a baby to bed..daniels is smaller than austin, if that counts as a qualifier? I'm going by the momentum of the swing. Austin look like he caught the full impact, while Daniels... not really. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:33:54 GMT -5
Brock's F5 LOOKS nasty, which in reality is why it's such a terrible move.
Remember the old school Pedigree? It looked a lot more brutal.... because IT WAS.
"Better" has to be qualified.
|
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:41:20 GMT -5
Brock's F5 LOOKS nasty, which in reality is why it's such a terrible move. Remember the old school Pedigree? It looked a lot more brutal.... because IT WAS. "Better" has to be qualified. i called gunnar's better because of how he placed daniels. Brock's (not to sound like i'm not a fan) never looked that good... |
|
|
|
Post by Double-H215 on Feb 5, 2014 14:46:32 GMT -5
Brock's F5 LOOKS nasty, which in reality is why it's such a terrible move. Remember the old school Pedigree? It looked a lot more brutal.... because IT WAS. "Better" has to be qualified. No, we know that was ****ed up. I think it's suppose to look a certain way. You say nasty & terrible, but I say believable (based on the F-5 we saw in this thread). We both don't want another Albert **** happening again, but I think that's just the thing of the past. So if it looks terrible and it keep looking terrible without hurting anybody, then I would have to say "perfect." |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:51:01 GMT -5
Brock's F5 LOOKS nasty, which in reality is why it's such a terrible move. Remember the old school Pedigree? It looked a lot more brutal.... because IT WAS. "Better" has to be qualified. No, we know that was ****ed up. I think it's suppose to look a certain way. You say nasty & terrible, but I say believable (based on the F-5 we saw in this thread). We both don't want another Albert **** happening again, but I think that's just the thing of the past. So if it looks terrible and it keep looking terrible without hurting anybody, then I would have to say "perfect." How is it "a thing of the past" when Lesnar has injured at least 3 people since coming back? |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Feb 5, 2014 14:54:35 GMT -5
i'm a huge Kenta Kobashi fan, but i hated the fact he used the Burning Hammer (even if it was on an extremely limited basis), because it was such a dangerous move.
|
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Feb 5, 2014 14:57:40 GMT -5
i'm a huge Kenta Kobashi fan, but i hated the fact he used the Burning Hammer (even if it was on an extremely limited basis), because it was such a dangerous move. OH SHIT! I've just Googled that move, I seen the inverted firmans carry and thought "Inverted AA"... Nope, The move I saw is just nasty.  |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Feb 5, 2014 14:58:53 GMT -5
The real burning hammer is vile looking, and therefore one of the coolest looking moves in wrestling. A lot of guys use a version that's basically an inverted AA
|
|
|
|
Post by Double-H215 on Feb 5, 2014 15:00:20 GMT -5
No, we know that was ****ed up. I think it's suppose to look a certain way. You say nasty & terrible, but I say believable (based on the F-5 we saw in this thread). We both don't want another Albert **** happening again, but I think that's just the thing of the past. So if it looks terrible and it keep looking terrible without hurting anybody, then I would have to say "perfect." How is it "a thing of the past" when Lesnar has injured at least 3 people since coming back? He injured somebody with the F-5 during his time back? |
|
|
|
Post by TomJohns on Feb 5, 2014 15:00:25 GMT -5
|
|
