|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Apr 10, 2014 19:31:55 GMT -5
Yes, very much so. Like I said, any time they're claiming that two people are the champion, it's not really relevant as an accomplishment. If you're both the champion, you can't really claim that you're the best. You just can't. Same reason that two heavy Note, I never said that the feud was irrelevant. Notice I only said when they were both champion. The feud did a great job of promoting the championship and making it really relevant.....until they tried making it out as if more than one person can be the champion at one time. [ again we disagree there's a difference between irrelevance and not being as relevant as you want it to be No. I agree that I don't care about championships because they don't matter. They're not relevant if two people are the champion at the same time. There's nothing to debate there. Once again, you can't claim you're on top if there are two people holding the championship. Hell, I don't care if they're relevant, so I don't know what you're trying to say. I've blatantly said that they're never matter. The fact that they fluctuate with relevance kind of proves the fact that championships don't matter. |
|
|
|
Post by skylerb97 on Apr 10, 2014 19:35:08 GMT -5
As far as I've read, admittedly not a lot, Punk was complaining about how WWE isn't using the new talent and was pushing people that have already had the spotlight (bad wordplay there since Punk's had the spotlight, but I mean oldies). Was he mad that he didn't have the spotlight at WM? Probably, but when you think about who did, that's pretty reasonable. Batista, dammit. Batista. Yeah... I don't for a second buy it. When I see video of him talking about it, he's lying. CM Punk has always been all about CM Punk. He's never been loyal to the company, or to anything other than himself for that matter. Him walking out and saying it was all about how the new talent wasn't being used properly is ridiculous... he had no way of knowing what was going to happen at Wrestlemania. This although a lot of guys are like that, I'm tired of Punk putting on the facade that he she things for reasons other than his own gain |
|
RandomGB
Jobber
There's Nothing Here
I just put words together.
Posts: 1,722 
|
Post by RandomGB on Apr 11, 2014 11:30:43 GMT -5
More Undertaker NEWS
Referee Chad Patton did not know that The Undertaker would be losing to Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania XXX. He was told Taker was winning but the rule every referee is told is that if the guys don’t kick out, you continue the count. Right after the match ended, Lesnar whispered in Taker’s ear, “Thank you.”
Apparently the decision to end The Streak was finalized on March 31st. Only a few people knew the outcome before WrestleMania Sunday. The group of people that knew were most likely Vince McMahon, Taker, Lesnar, Paul Heyman, Triple H and Stephanie McMahon. None of the agents were aware. The actual script for the show did not have a finish listed but this didn’t raise any red flags because that’s not unusual for WrestleMania and it wasn’t the only match that didn’t have a finish listed.
Whether or not The Undertaker is done, Vince was going on the assumption that this was his last match and he could either win or lose. McMahon chose the idea that it’s better to lose on your way out. One person close to the situation said Vince talked Taker into losing. Another person, who would also be in the know, described it as Vince making the call and Taker agreeing, and that he wasn’t talked into doing something he didn’t want to do. Losing was not Taker’s original decision but he was in on it and never protested the decision. Perhaps, like he thought in 2010, if he was going to lose, maybe he thought Lesnar was the guy to lose to.
There were many people within WWE very unhappy about The Streak ending but couldn’t say so publicly.
Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter
Hmm apparently not a credible source take it as you will *shrugs*
|
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Apr 11, 2014 11:49:30 GMT -5
None of that sounds difficult to believe... but since it's from Wrestling Observer, I'm tempted to say it's all lies just out of habit.
|
|
|
|
Post by pinksparklepuff on Apr 12, 2014 18:18:44 GMT -5
A pro like Chad Patton would have raised 'Taker's shoulder off the mat with telekinesis if he was told 'Taker was going over.
"Thank you" is not in Lesnar's vocabulary. Nor is "epeirogeny."
|
|
|
|
Post by skylerb97 on Apr 12, 2014 18:36:35 GMT -5
A pro like Chad Patton would have raised 'Taker's shoulder off the mat with telekinesis if he was told 'Taker was going over. "Thank you" is not in Lesnar's vocabulary. Nor is "epeirogeny." the better question is I'd epierogeny in anybody's vocabulary here |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2014 18:39:45 GMT -5
A pro like Chad Patton would have raised 'Taker's shoulder off the mat with telekinesis if he was told 'Taker was going over. "Thank you" is not in Lesnar's vocabulary. Nor is "epeirogeny." "Thank you" in Lesnar language is "DANDNANDNKAJDBKA *girly scream*" |
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Apr 14, 2014 9:42:54 GMT -5
No. Punk walked out on his contract like a child, because he wasn't getting the match he wanted. There is a sharp difference between refusing to participate in something you know lacks integrity (like an actor refusing to be in a movie if he knows it's going to be bad), and refusing to do something because you can't have everything your own way. Punk has no integrity. He didn't leave because of what was going to happen, he left because of what was not going to happen; namely, CM Punk getting a Wrestlemania Main Event. As far as I've read, admittedly not a lot, Punk was complaining about how WWE isn't using the new talent and was pushing people that have already had the spotlight (bad wordplay there since Punk's had the spotlight, but I mean oldies). Was he mad that he didn't have the spotlight at WM? Probably, but when you think about who did, that's pretty reasonable. Batista, dammit. Batista. And Punk is a hypocrite. He leaves because he isn't in the main event. But he is one of those people that get pushed all the time. So what exactly was he trying to accomplish? |
|
