|
Post by setokaiba on Jul 5, 2014 17:33:59 GMT -5
|
|
Gmensox007
Jobber
The Forum Lone-Wolf
Back to Reality......
Posts: 1,152
|
Post by Gmensox007 on Jul 5, 2014 17:37:11 GMT -5
She is a hot female, at least if you judge by the rule of majority. I disagree completely. She's gross.
|
|
|
Post by WSS? on Jul 5, 2014 17:38:55 GMT -5
...Why does Gmen always use GIFs of kids' shows?
|
|
Gmensox007
Jobber
The Forum Lone-Wolf
Back to Reality......
Posts: 1,152
|
Post by Gmensox007 on Jul 5, 2014 17:39:59 GMT -5
...Why does Gmen always use GIFs of kids' shows? What do you mean always??
that was the only interesting attack gif that came up.........
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Jul 5, 2014 17:42:05 GMT -5
...Why does Gmen always use GIFs of kids' shows?
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Jul 5, 2014 18:03:39 GMT -5
I never judge by the majority. They're usually wrong. Since attractiveness is a matter of subjectivity you should judge by the majority.
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Jul 5, 2014 18:04:46 GMT -5
I never judge by the majority. They're usually wrong. Since attractiveness is a matter of subjectivity you should judge by the majority. So because people think Jennifer Aniston's hot, I should say that she is hot even though I don't think she is, lol?
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Jul 5, 2014 18:06:37 GMT -5
Since attractiveness is a matter of subjectivity you should judge by the majority. So because people think Jennifer Aniston's hot, I should say that she is hot even though I don't think she is, lol? Not necessarily. If you're criticizing decisions made by a business based off of someone's attractiveness then yes you should.
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 5, 2014 19:05:55 GMT -5
1) We weren't talking about Bayley or Paige. We were talking about The Ascension, and you brought up Charlotte for reasons I can't fathom, but I rolled with it, because despite your strange inability to see it, Charlotte is actually pretty talented. Certainly more so (for her division) than either member of The Ascension
2) The Ascension absolutely $[HASH]@!ing sucks. They're nothing but hype, and even the WWE knows this, which is why everyone else gets called up while The Ascension continues their irrelevant "dominant" run as champions holding belts that nobody cares about.
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Jul 5, 2014 19:07:56 GMT -5
1) We weren't talking about Bayley or Paige. We were talking about The Ascension, and you brought up Charlotte for reasons I can't fathom, but I rolled with it, because despite your strange inability to see it, Charlotte is actually pretty talented. Certainly more so (for her division) than either member of The Ascension 2) The Ascension absolutely $[HASH]@!ing sucks. They're nothing but hype, and even the WWE knows this, which is why everyone else gets called up while The Ascension continues their irrelevant "dominant" run as champions holding belts that nobody cares about. You mean to tell me Charlotte's better than Konnor? Darn Tootin'.
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Jul 5, 2014 19:09:50 GMT -5
I haven't seen much of the Ascension but aren't they like Gothic Road Warriors or something ?
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 5, 2014 19:10:30 GMT -5
You mean to tell me Charlotte's better than Konnor? Darn Tootin'. Unequivocally. If someone asked me who I would rather see in a tag match with against Kidd & Gabriel, between The Ascension and the BFFs, I'd take the BFFs on 100% of days ending in "y." ... and that's despite the handicap imposed by Sasha Banks being fairly overrated herself. Seriously, if someone can name even one exciting or interesting thing that The Ascension does in the ring I'll give them a cookie.
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 5, 2014 19:11:13 GMT -5
I haven't seen much of the Ascension but aren't they like a Gothic Road Warriors or something ? Yes. Except that the Road Warriors had some exciting spots, and The Ascension has nothing whatsoever, other than left over costumes that the APA never got around to wearing.
|
|
|
Post by BaneTheDestroyer on Jul 5, 2014 19:14:06 GMT -5
You mean to tell me Charlotte's better than Konnor? Darn Tootin'. Unequivocally. If someone asked me who I would rather see in a tag match with against Kidd & Gabriel, between The Ascension and the BFFs, I'd take the BFFs on 100% of days ending in "y." ... and that's despite the handicap imposed by Sasha Banks being fairly overrated herself. Seriously, if someone can name even one exciting or interesting thing that The Ascension does in the ring I'll give them a cookie. I don't know if it was obvious, but I was being sarcastic up there, lol. Also, what the hell does that first word mean? I'm not the brightest when it comes to vocab.
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Jul 5, 2014 19:14:57 GMT -5
Kidd and Gabriel are a tag team again and not on the main roster?
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 5, 2014 19:19:12 GMT -5
Unequivocally. If someone asked me who I would rather see in a tag match with against Kidd & Gabriel, between The Ascension and the BFFs, I'd take the BFFs on 100% of days ending in "y." ... and that's despite the handicap imposed by Sasha Banks being fairly overrated herself. Seriously, if someone can name even one exciting or interesting thing that The Ascension does in the ring I'll give them a cookie. I don't know if it was obvious, but I was being sarcastic up there, lol. Also, what the hell does that first word mean? I'm not the brightest when it comes to vocab. Unequivocally means "clearly." It's a fancy way of saying I agreed with your post 8)
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 5, 2014 19:19:33 GMT -5
Kidd and Gabriel are a tag team again and not on the main roster? Yep. Kidd convinced Gabriel to turn heel on the last NXT. It was awesome.
|
|
Gmensox007
Jobber
The Forum Lone-Wolf
Back to Reality......
Posts: 1,152
|
Post by Gmensox007 on Jul 5, 2014 19:25:03 GMT -5
...Why does Gmen always use GIFs of kids' shows?
|
|
|
Post by Raven_turns#HEELYESBITW on Jul 7, 2014 17:51:57 GMT -5
Top 5 NXT Talents (In My Opinion) 5. Connor O'Brien (or Konnor whatever he goes by) 4. Sami Zayn 3. Tyler Breeze 2. Corey Graves 1. Adrian Neville Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Jul 10, 2014 23:14:38 GMT -5
My new pet NXT theory (particularly as pertains to Divas, but NXT guys in general)
People like to say that NXT workers are often better workers than Main Roster WWE guys. I've never particularly bought this, but now I've come up with a theory to explain the phenomenon. Most of the WWE "superstars" and "divas" have been working TV so long that they no longer feel that they need to have solid fundamentals. They go out there and work "their match," which for most of them means a whole bunch of punchkick and a handful of signature moves.
Contrarywise, NXT insists that their workers focus on fundamentals, and therefore when we see them, particularly when we see them working with Main Roster talent, they seem to be "better" wrestlers because they're doing more of the things we associate with solid traditional wrestling. In reality they aren't "better"... it's not as if (let's just say Fandango by way of example) doesn't have solid fundamentals... it's just that he's not obligated to use them on a weekly basis.
|
|