Another Anonymous Letter

[TomJohns]

F4Wonline.com has published yet another letter. 

, Punk is being a little bitch. I liked him so much before his run leading to and after that Money in the Bank in Chicago. He's a guy where you have to be really in his circle for him to I guess open up, which I understand, but being put in a feud with Kane and then with HHH at Mania is not a bad thing. Now I understand he feels this is his last Mania and he wants to main event and really, with the right storyline, that match could main event, but literally after the Tribute to the Troops incident he's just been difficult. There are so many there that want his spot, that want to say, 'I need a weekend off to go to UFC.' I really and fully believe he's a little jealous of the crowd reactions to Bryan and it's getting to him—He's just been such a dick lately. That interview with Ariel, he acted like he was the victim at the Troops taping when Michelle was just joking. Little bitch AJ took it to the wrong level. Do you really think AJ would have a 'pipe bomb' interview time or longest Diva champ BS if she wasn't dating Punk? Punk really doesn't want to be the face of the company. That's BS. I hate hearing that shit. He says he does but this isn't ROH or OVW. He would bitch so much if he had to do Michael & Kelly at 9 a.m., then fly to a different state (for Raw), do a Make-A-Wish at 1 p.m. and then RAW, then do SmackDown, then do something Wednesday to fly home Thursday to be on the road Friday or Saturday. No way he could handle that for four months. He may come back as soon as Monday or he may never come back, but if never comes back he better remember how many fans he's fucking over right now, the same way he believes the WWE is fucking him over. And I'm not defending Vince or HHH. Especially HHH, because people are seeing that HHH taking over isn't as cool as they thought it would be. Outlaws, Nash, X-Pac, Flair, HBK, Batista—yeah must be nice to be HHH friends.

Thoughts?

[muta75]

quite the potty mouth on Stephanie McMahon-Helmsley-Levesque

[Deleted]

One thing about these letters. At least Punk takes responsibility for the shit he wants to talk, and doesn't use internet courage to speak his mind.

[ethanm1834]

Feb 8, 2014 10:25:57 GMT -5 @crazyday said:

One thing about these letters. At least Punk takes responsibility for the s*** he wants to talk, and doesn't use internet courage to speak his mind.

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little bitch. You don't walk out on your contract it's a bitch move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

[Deleted]

Feb 8, 2014 14:20:03 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Feb 8, 2014 10:25:57 GMT -5 @crazyday said:

One thing about these letters. At least Punk takes responsibility for the s*** he wants to talk, and doesn't use internet courage to speak his mind.

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little b****. You don't walk out on your contract it's a b**** move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

He did speak out, in public, there's video posted in another thread. However that's not what I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that when Punk calls people out like whomever wrote this did, you know it's coming from Punk. And not from Johnny anonymous behind a computer like the bitch he claims Punk is. Wasn't really arguing contract obligations either. 

[ethanm1834]

Feb 8, 2014 14:37:53 GMT -5 @crazyday said:

Feb 8, 2014 14:20:03 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little b****. You don't walk out on your contract it's a b**** move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

He did speak out, in public, there's video posted in another thread. However that's not what I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that when Punk calls people out like whomever wrote this did, you know it's coming from Punk. And not from Johnny anonymous behind a computer like the b**** he claims Punk is. Wasn't really arguing contract obligations either. 

I suppose so, my point is this, the way the fans behave I can understand the being anonymous. They act like Punk is God and not foulable anything that goes against him would be booed down. As for Punk calling out his problems publicly....he totally uses internet courage to speak his mind. He has the crowd support he isn't going to be lambasted like others will.

All that being said at some point anon will have to come out, and I'd use it as and angle to build some heat for WWE. Why not make money off of it either way.

[muta75]

Feb 8, 2014 14:20:03 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Feb 8, 2014 10:25:57 GMT -5 @crazyday said:

One thing about these letters. At least Punk takes responsibility for the s*** he wants to talk, and doesn't use internet courage to speak his mind.

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little b****. You don't walk out on your contract it's a b**** move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

the company can walk you at any point, contract or not, but because he decides he doesn't want to be there any more that makes it a "bitch move"? the real "bitch move" is staying with an employer you don't want to work for any more.

[muta75]

Feb 8, 2014 14:49:33 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Feb 8, 2014 14:37:53 GMT -5 @crazyday said:

He did speak out, in public, there's video posted in another thread. However that's not what I was talking about. I was referring to the fact that when Punk calls people out like whomever wrote this did, you know it's coming from Punk. And not from Johnny anonymous behind a computer like the b**** he claims Punk is. Wasn't really arguing contract obligations either. 

I suppose so, my point is this, the way the fans behave I can understand the being anonymous. They act like Punk is God and not foulable anything that goes against him would be booed down. As for Punk calling out his problems publicly....he totally uses internet courage to speak his mind. He has the crowd support he isn't going to be lambasted like others will.

All that being said at some point anon will have to come out, and I'd use it as and angle to build some heat for WWE. Why not make money off of it either way.

you're trying to be wrong, huh?

[ethanm1834]

Feb 8, 2014 14:51:53 GMT -5 muta75 said:

Feb 8, 2014 14:20:03 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little b****. You don't walk out on your contract it's a b**** move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

the company can walk you at any point, contract or not, but because he decides he doesn't want to be there any more that makes it a "b**** move"? the real "b**** move" is staying with an employer you don't want to work for any more.

It's called honoring your commitments. As a consultant I have a contract and looked over everything before I signed it. There are ways out of my contract if I truly wish to be freed from it. If I sign something I do it, and thats where I come from on that point.

[muta75]

Feb 8, 2014 14:56:54 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Feb 8, 2014 14:51:53 GMT -5 muta75 said:

the company can walk you at any point, contract or not, but because he decides he doesn't want to be there any more that makes it a "b**** move"? the real "b**** move" is staying with an employer you don't want to work for any more.

It's called honoring your commitments. As a consultant I have a contract and looked over everything before I signed it. There are ways out of my contract if I truly wish to be freed from it. If I sign something I do it, and thats where I come from on that point.

and you know the structure of Punk's deal well enough to say he didn't have an out?

[muta75]

besides all that, if you don't want to be there..walk away. a job isn't a prison sentence.

[BaneTheDestroyer]

Feb 8, 2014 14:51:53 GMT -5 muta75 said:

Feb 8, 2014 14:20:03 GMT -5 ethanm1834 said:

Saying nothing at all isn't really taking responsibility. He's been silent...Now the letter is right he is a little b****. You don't walk out on your contract it's a b**** move. However the letter just seems bitter and small whomever it is while making good points, still comes off small. At the same time doing it in secret is fine, because the Punk and IWC fans aren't going to listen to any reason. Punk is God to them and he can do no wrong.

the company can walk you at any point, contract or not, but because he decides he doesn't want to be there any more that makes it a "b**** move"? the real "b**** move" is staying with an employer you don't want to work for any more.

I couldn't agree with you more.

[charliebucketsgranpa]

I still think there could have been a more diplomatic way of doing it but Punk had a right to be unhappy and in a way I see where he was coming from.

[BaneTheDestroyer]

Feb 8, 2014 15:34:46 GMT -5 charliebucketsgranpa said:

I still think there could have been a more diplomatic way of doing it but Punk had a right to be unhappy and in a way I see where he was coming from.

I also couldn't agree with you more.

[muta75]

Feb 8, 2014 15:34:46 GMT -5 charliebucketsgranpa said:

I still think there could have been a more diplomatic way of doing it but Punk had a right to be unhappy and in a way I see where he was coming from.

you want diplomatic? ok, i won't come to work and you don't pay me..that's about as diplomatic as i get when i'm done with something..

[wildknight]

You people defending Punk really need to take your fanboy hat off for a while. The guy bitched up, period. He didn't get his way so he took his ball and went home. I don't care how you try to spin it, that was bullshit on the playground and it's bullshit now. I say good riddance.

As to the notion that he "took responsibility"... no, he didn't. He stirred up a shitstorm and then sat there and lied to the public with a smile on his face, acting as if he really wanted Bryan to get that Mania shot and he wasn't really bothered by Batista coming in. Bitch please.

[setokaiba]

If these letters are legit I wish whoever are writing them would put there name on it.If your going to call some a bitch don't do it anonymously.

[Double-H215]

Feb 9, 2014 0:34:44 GMT -5 setokaiba said:

If these letters are legit I wish whoever are writing them would put there name on it.If your going to call some a b**** don't do it anonymously.

I don't think that's a problem for that person. But I believe what was said in that letter, could get him in trouble.

[muta75]

Feb 8, 2014 23:37:51 GMT -5 wildknight said:

You people defending Punk really need to take your fanboy hat off for a while. The guy b****ed up, period. He didn't get his way so he took his ball and went home. I don't care how you try to spin it, that was bulls*** on the playground and it's bulls*** now. I say good riddance.

As to the notion that he "took responsibility"... no, he didn't. He stirred up a s***storm and then sat there and lied to the public with a smile on his face, acting as if he really wanted Bryan to get that Mania shot and he wasn't really bothered by Batista coming in. b**** please.

i'm saying if he doesn't want to be there, why should he stay? because of a contract? bullshit, he wants to go let him go. if he's not happy what would that do for business having a guy like that walking around angry. it's a bigger shit storm than him leaving.

as for that interview, would you have rather he buried everyone? i'm sure as shit you'd take shots at him for that too..

[wildknight]

Feb 9, 2014 3:43:58 GMT -5 muta75 said:

i'm saying if he doesn't want to be there, why should he stay? because of a contract? bulls***,

Yes. I would have preferred that he honor his commitments like a man. You don't quit in the third quarter of a game just because you're not winning.

as for that interview, would you have rather he buried everyone? i'm sure as s*** you'd take shots at him for that too..

Do you think that it might be at all possibly that there might be some space for other options in between "burying everyone" and "total dishonesty"?