|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 4, 2014 14:32:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Mar 4, 2014 14:39:22 GMT -5
...Then which is the one that Wild likes? I don't know |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 4, 2014 14:57:51 GMT -5
Boondocks isn't anime and the writer isn't a Nazi, he's a black supremacist who is close friends with a man who murdered a police officer for the "crime" of being white. That said, Boondocks does frequently make some very poignant arguments, particularly about pop culture, self-delusion, and the importance of being aware of what one "consumes" from pop culture. I refuse to read it not because of it's content, but because I refuse to support the man who created it as long as he believes that violence against my children is an acceptable response to what he perceives as racism.
The anime that I like, with the corgi, is called Cowboy Bebop, and is awesome.
|
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606 
|
Post by muta75 on Mar 4, 2014 15:08:47 GMT -5
when ass kissing goes bad...
|
|
|
|
Post by skylerb97 on Mar 4, 2014 19:19:57 GMT -5
Boondocks isn't anime and the writer isn't a Nazi, he's a black supremacist who is close friends with a man who murdered a police officer for the "crime" of being white. That said, Boondocks does frequently make some very poignant arguments, particularly about pop culture, self-delusion, and the importance of being aware of what one "consumes" from pop culture. I refuse to read it not because of it's content, but because I refuse to support the man who created it as long as he believes that violence against my children is an acceptable response to what he perceives as racism. The anime that I like, with the corgi, is called Cowboy Bebop, and is awesome. But that shouldn't make it a guilty pleasure for those who like the show. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 9, 2014 20:44:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 9, 2014 20:53:16 GMT -5
That article is hilarious. Conspiracy theorists and believers are always fun to listen to. |
|
|
|
Post by setokaiba on Mar 9, 2014 20:54:12 GMT -5
...Then which is the one that Wild likes? Cowboy Bebop. It's really good but I prefer Outlaw Star. |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Mar 12, 2014 18:57:55 GMT -5
i love women, but i hate the one who made this list..
A man is a rape-supporter if…
He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.
He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.
He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man.
He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked.
He has procured a prostitute.
He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes.
He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional.
He has gone to a strip club.
He is anti-abortion.
He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.
He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.”
He watches pornography in which women are depicted.
He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.
He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man.
He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed.
He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects
He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.
He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them.
He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill.
He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.
He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.
He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.”
He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.”
He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children.
He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”
He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.
He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity.
He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2014 19:01:18 GMT -5
Boondocks isn't anime and the writer isn't a Nazi, he's a black supremacist who is close friends with a man who murdered a police officer for the "crime" of being white. That said, Boondocks does frequently make some very poignant arguments, particularly about pop culture, self-delusion, and the importance of being aware of what one "consumes" from pop culture. I refuse to read it not because of it's content, but because I refuse to support the man who created it as long as he believes that violence against my children is an acceptable response to what he perceives as racism. The anime that I like, with the corgi, is called Cowboy Bebop, and is awesome. I know a "good" anime style cartoon called "The Boondocks" it's like South Park but with meaning. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 12, 2014 19:10:04 GMT -5
Boondocks isn't anime and the writer isn't a Nazi, he's a black supremacist who is close friends with a man who murdered a police officer for the "crime" of being white. That said, Boondocks does frequently make some very poignant arguments, particularly about pop culture, self-delusion, and the importance of being aware of what one "consumes" from pop culture. I refuse to read it not because of it's content, but because I refuse to support the man who created it as long as he believes that violence against my children is an acceptable response to what he perceives as racism. The anime that I like, with the corgi, is called Cowboy Bebop, and is awesome. I know a "good" anime style cartoon called "The Boondocks" it's like South Park but with meaning. Yeah, you're talking about the same thing I am, except that I would hardly call Boondocks "good" and South Park has meaning... South Park is easily the most accessible social commentary/satire in the U.S. right now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2014 19:14:09 GMT -5
I know a "good" anime style cartoon called "The Boondocks" it's like South Park but with meaning. Yeah, you're talking about the same thing I am, except that I would hardly call Boondocks "good" and South Park has meaning... South Park is easily the most accessible social commentary/satire in the U.S. right now. i said the Boondocks "anime" was like SP but with a little it of meaning. (And an african-american dude who hated african-americans) |
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 12, 2014 19:15:33 GMT -5
i love women, but i hate the one who made this list.. A man is a rape-supporter if… He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion. He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense. He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man. He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked. He has procured a prostitute. He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes. He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional. He has gone to a strip club. He is anti-abortion. He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available. He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.” He watches pornography in which women are depicted. He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present. He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man. He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed. He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification. He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them. He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill. He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention. He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men. He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s. He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women. He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.” He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.” He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children. He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.” He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing. He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity. He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them. Either she's a bitch, or this was meant to mock liberals. I'm shooting for the former. |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 12, 2014 19:42:53 GMT -5
Holy crap I'm a rape supporter! I've totally had sex with a woman who was drunk and restrained! I'll have to go tell my wife that our romantic weekend was actually rapey!
|
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 12, 2014 19:44:20 GMT -5
Holy crap I'm a rape supporter! I've totally had sex with a woman who was drunk and restrained! I'll have to go tell my wife that our romantic weekend was actually rapey! You're also anti-abortionist you fiend! |
|
|
|
Post by wildknight on Mar 12, 2014 19:50:35 GMT -5
Holy crap I'm a rape supporter! I've totally had sex with a woman who was drunk and restrained! I'll have to go tell my wife that our romantic weekend was actually rapey! You're also anti-abortionist you fiend! Oh I already knew I was a "contributor to the rape culture" because I'm pro-life. I've heard this many times. |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Mar 12, 2014 19:51:41 GMT -5
i love women, but i hate the one who made this list.. A man is a rape-supporter if… He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion. He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense. He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man. He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked. He has procured a prostitute. He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes. He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional. He has gone to a strip club. He is anti-abortion. He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available. He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.” He watches pornography in which women are depicted. He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present. He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man. He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed. He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification. He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them. He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill. He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention. He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men. He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s. He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women. He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.” He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.” He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children. He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.” He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing. He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity. He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them. Either she's a bitch, or this was meant to mock liberals. I'm shooting for the former. i should have posted the link to the blog.. evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/ |
|
muta75
Jobber
RONDA ROUSEY IS THE BEST FIGHTER ON THE PLANET
Posts: 3,606
|
Post by muta75 on Mar 12, 2014 19:53:25 GMT -5
You're also anti-abortionist you fiend! Oh I already knew I was a "contributor to the rape culture" because I'm pro-life. I've heard this many times. you're also a contributor if you're pro-choice.. |
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 12, 2014 19:54:14 GMT -5
That's hilarious. It only further adds to my theory that she is a bitch. |
|
|
|
Post by SoonDragon67 on Mar 12, 2014 19:54:33 GMT -5
Oh I already knew I was a "contributor to the rape culture" because I'm pro-life. I've heard this many times. you're also a contributor if you're pro-choice.. No, only if you're pro-choice because you think women will have sex more. |
|
